Daily Archives: 17 October 2006

UK Soldier Rescues Injured US Sergeant

It’s been said that being in a war takes the measure of a man. That is, the stress of killing or being
killed tends to bring out either the best or worst in people. In
the case of UK paratrooper Peter McKinley, age 21, it may have been the
former.

According to the Manchester newspaper
article
, a U.S. supply convoy was ambushed in a region of Afghanistan called Sangin. One hundred
British paratroopers were sent to rescue the convoy. During the
engagement, two Americans were pinned down and wounded. Hearing their
cries for help, Private McKinley, in the face of rocket propelled
grenades and withering machine gun fire, selflessly ran across open
ground to reach the location of the two men. Then, amid incoming rounds
that continued to rain around him, and with complete disregard for his
own safety, he provided first aide care to the seriously wounded
sergeant.

Victoria Cross award.If the newspaper account is accurate,
and I have no reason to believe it is not, then it is not surprising
that Private McKinley is being nominated for Britain’s highest war time
award – the Victoria
Cross
. The VC, as it is sometimes called, is awarded ‘to those officers or men
who have served us in the presence of the enemy and shall then have
performed some signal act of valour or devotion to their country’.
If the award is so bestowed, McKinley will apparently be only the second living individual in the last 40 years to
be so honored.

Advertisements

Open Letter to John Umbaugh

Sometimes I get emails that I have to wonder what the sender was thinking. For example, I got
something from someone who calls himself John. John says he is a
student at the University of Michigan and wants some help on a project
he is working on. What he wants from me is the following information:

  1. What is your full name?
  2. What is your email (I will
    keep this private)?
  3. What is the name of your
    blog?
  4. What is the URL of your blog?
  5. What is your date of birth?
  6. Are you Male or Female?
  7. Would you characterize
    yourself politically as a Democrat
  8. (Liberal), Republican
    (Conservative), Independent, or Other?
  9. If Other, would you please
    provide details?
  10. Are you the only author of
    your blog?
  11. If not, are you the primary
    author? About what percent do you contribute? What is the
    makeup of your blog’s
    other authors?

Now, maybe John is who he says
he is and maybe he isn’t. But if a stranger came up to me and started
asking me these questions I would walk away at question number one.

But, for a minute, let’s suspend reality and say he is who he says
he is.

How did he get my email address? If he were for real, he probably would have come to my site
and got it from the link I have on the right side of the page. If so,
he would know my full name because it across the banner at the top of
this page. Indeed, since he has already sent me an email, to ask me
question number two (what is my email address) seems curious. In fact,
if he has come to my site questions three and four are also strange. All of which leads me to
disbelieve John.

In today’s environment of epidemic identity theft, question five is none of his business. If he wants to
give ranges of ages (e.g., 20 to 29, 30 to 39, etc.), I might answer
that. But my actual birth date? Shirley you jest.

I won’t even discuss the other questions. The bottom line is, if this were a sanctioned study of the
University of Michigan I would think John would need to get what is
known as Informed Consent. In order to do that, you need to lay out, in
detail, why you need the information, how you will  safeguard
it, and specifically what you will do with it in perpetuity. He would
also need my signature (digital or otherwise).

And finally, neither his email address nor his website is hosted by the University of Michigan.

As a former social sciences major, an interesting experiment would
be to send out different emails to randomly chosen email addresses.
The only difference in the emails would be the type of questions asked.
For example, one type would be completely innocuous such as what is
your favorite color or favorite type of desert. From there, the types
would get progressively more personal. It would be interesting to see
what type of questions would get the most responses (assuming here an
equal number of each type were sent). But I digress.

In order for me to give this type of information I have to trust and
believe John is who he says he is and will use the data for the purpose
he states. But since I don’t trust unsolicited emails, especially
ones that ask these types of question, I will not be answering
John. If you are out there John, sorry, but I decline to participate.

Aloha!